Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes After Carotid Artery Ligation Versus Carotid Artery Reconstruction Following Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Infants and Children

  • Lindsay A. Gil
  • , Jordan C. Apfeld
  • , Alison Gehred
  • , Ashely B. Walczak
  • , W. Joshua Frazier
  • , Ruth B. Seabrook
  • , Oluyinka O. Olutoye
  • , Peter C. Minneci
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • Ohio State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: In pediatric and neonatal populations, the carotid artery is commonly cannulated for venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The decision to ligate (carotid artery ligation [CAL]) versus reconstruct (carotid artery reconstruction [CAR]) the artery at decannulation remains controversial as long-term neurologic outcomes remain unknown. The objective of this study was to summarize current literature on clinical outcomes following CAL and CAR after Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords from January 1950 to October 2020. Studies examining clinical outcomes following CAL and CAR for VA-ECMO in patients <18 y of age were included. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, case-control studies, and case reports were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were performed independently by two reviewers. Assessment of risk of bias was performed. Results: Eighty studies were included and classified into four categories: noncomparative clinical outcomes after CAL (n = 23, 28.8%), noncomparative clinical outcomes after CAR (n = 12, 15.0%), comparative clinical outcomes after CAL and/or CAR (n = 28, 35.0%), and case reports of clinical outcomes after CAL and/or CAR (n = 17, 21.3%). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 11 y. CAR patency rates ranged from 44 to 100%. There was no substantial evidence supporting an association between CAL versus CAR and short-term neurologic outcomes. Conclusions: Studies evaluating outcomes after CAL versus CAR for VA-ECMO are heterogeneous with limited generalizability. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term consequences of CAL versus CAR, especially as the first survivors of pediatric/neonatal ECMO approach an age of increased risk of carotid stenosis and stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-432
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume291
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carotid Arteries/surgery
  • Carotid Artery, Common/surgery
  • Child
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes After Carotid Artery Ligation Versus Carotid Artery Reconstruction Following Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Infants and Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this