Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adolescent Substance Use Screening in the Emergency Department

  • Stephen Sandelich
  • , Siraj Amanullah
  • , Isabella Barata
  • , Kathleen Berg
  • , Kathleen Brown
  • , Tabitha Cheng
  • , Corrie Chimptazi
  • , Ilene Claudius
  • , Ann M. Dietrich
  • , Sophia Lin
  • , Tim Ruttan
  • , Michael Stoner
  • , Carmen Sulton
  • , Muhammad Waseem
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Brown University
  • Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • George Washington University
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Duke University
  • Prisma Health
  • Cornell University
  • Emory University
  • Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Adolescent substance use remains a major public health concern, and the emergency department (ED) represents a critical point of contact for identification and early intervention. Many adolescents rely on the ED as their primary or sole source of health care, making missed opportunities for screening particularly consequential. Although overall substance use rates among youth have stabilized or declined in recent years, drug-related mortality, especially from illicitly manufactured fentanyl, has risen sharply, highlighting the need for proactive detection and intervention. Professional organizations recommend universal, validated screening for substance use in adolescents, yet implementation in ED settings remains inconsistent due to workflow constraints, confidentiality concerns, and limited provider training. Validated tools, such as the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) questionnaire, the screening to brief intervention (S2BI) tool, and the brief screener for tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs (BSTAD) tool, allow rapid, developmentally appropriate screening. They can be integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) or self-administered digital formats. Evidence suggests that electronic or kiosk-based screening increases disclosure and detection without adversely affecting throughput. Screening alone is insufficient; pairing detection with brief motivational interventions and facilitated referral to treatment improves short-term outcomes and linkage to care. However, follow-up rates remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for structured referral pathways, behavioral health integration, and technology-enabled supports such as text-based reminders or telehealth. Universal, developmentally tailored screening in the ED, combined with brief intervention and active linkage to outpatient care, offers a practical strategy to reduce substance-related morbidity and improve long-term outcomes for adolescents.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100447
Pages (from-to)100447
JournalJACEP Open
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • adolescent substance use
  • brief intervention
  • emergency department screening
  • linkage to care
  • SBRIT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescent Substance Use Screening in the Emergency Department'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this