Abstract
Context. We evaluated the validity of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) as a brief screen for health literacy in children. Objectives. To (a) test the hypothesis that child performance on the NVS correlates with performance on a test of child reading comprehension and (b) establish age-based cutoffs for expected performance on the NVS. Design. Children aged 7 to 17 years were administered the NVS followed by the Gray Silent Reading Test (GSRT). Results. The NVS score correlated strongly with GSRT score (ρ = 0.71, P <.0001) and increased with age. Children aged 7 to 9 years had a median NVS score of 1 (interquartile range = 1-2); children aged 10 to 17 years had a median score of 3 (interquartile range = 2-4), P <.0001. Conclusion. The NVS performs well in this population. Children aged 10 to 17 years with an NVS score lower than 2 may have low health literacy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-144 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Clinical Pediatrics |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2014 |
Keywords
- Newest Vital Sign
- child literacy
- health literacy
- pediatric
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can the newest vital sign be used to assess health literacy in children and adolescents?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver