Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Detrusorrhaphy for the repair of vesicoureteral reflux: Comparison with the Leadbetter-Politano ureteroneocystostomy

  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors report their surgical experience for 56 patients (81 ureters) with vesicoureteral reflux using either the extravesical (detrusorrhaphy) approach or the Leadbetter-Politano (intravesical) procedure. The success rate was the same in both. Patients undergoing the extravesical approach required less pain medication and less anticholinergic therapy to control bladder spasms in the postoperative period as compared with the patients undergoing the repair through an intravesical approach. Because the bilateral extravesical approach may be associated with transient urinary retention, the authors recommend that bilateral procedures be performed with minimal dissection of the trigone or that this approach be limited to unilateral repair.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-603
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1995
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Leadbetter-Politano repair
  • Vesicoureteral reflux
  • detrusorrhaphy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detrusorrhaphy for the repair of vesicoureteral reflux: Comparison with the Leadbetter-Politano ureteroneocystostomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this