Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

"Early" versus "late" 23-week infant outcomes

  • Thinh P. Nguyen
  • , Erol Amon
  • , Mohamad Al-Hosni
  • , Jeffrey A. Gavard
  • , Gilad Gross
  • , Thomas D. Myles
  • Saint Louis University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether survival is different in "early" (230/7-233/7 weeks) vs "late" (23 4/7-236/7 weeks) infants. Study Design: Records of 126 consecutive liveborn infants delivered at 230/7 to 236/7 weeks' gestation from 2001-2010 were examined using the Vermont Oxford Network database. Infants born at 23 0/7 to 23 3/7 weeks were grouped into "early" and those at 23 4/7 to 23 6/7 weeks were "late." Clinical characteristics were compared between groups and multivariate analyses were used to predict survival. Results: Seventy-two infants were early and 54 were late. Survival was 25% vs 56%, respectively (P <.001). The early group was less likely to receive steroids (43% vs 65%; P =.016) and had a lower mean birthweight (547 g vs 596 g; P <.001). No difference in other factors was seen between groups. No change in survival was observed during the study period in either group. Conclusion: Late 23-week infants have improved survival compared with early infants. Delaying delivery as little as 24-96 hours may improve survival for 23-week infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226.e1-226.e6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume207
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Vermont Oxford Network
  • extremely low birthweight
  • extremely preterm birth
  • limits of viability
  • neonatal and infant survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"Early" versus "late" 23-week infant outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this