Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact and predictors of positive response to desensitization in pediatric heart transplant candidates

  • Jonathan J. Edwards
  • , Naomi Seliktar
  • , Rachel White
  • , Steven D. Heron
  • , Kimberly Lin
  • , Joseph Rossano
  • , Dimitri Monos
  • , Deborah Sesok-Pizzini
  • , Matthew J. O'Connor
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Desensitization, the process of reducing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), has unclear efficacy in pediatric HT candidates. METHODS: Pediatric HT candidates listed at our institution between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitization was defined as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 10% with ≥ 1 a strong positive antibody. The desensitization response was defined as a ≥ 25% reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for ≥ 90% of the strong positive antibodies on follow-up panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing before waitlist removal, HT, or death (data available for 13 patients). RESULTS: The HT candidates were categorized as sensitized receiving desensitization therapy (ST, n = 14), sensitized not receiving therapy (SNT, n = 18), or non-sensitized (n = 55). A desensitization response was observed in 8 (62%) of the ST upon repeat PRA testing, with the ST responders receiving more doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (8 vs 2, p < 0.05). The anti-HLA class I antibodies were particularly resistant for non-responders (p = 1.9 × 10−4). The combination of homograft and ventricular assist device was more sensitizing than either alone (p = 3.1 × 10−4). However, these sensitization risk factors did not impact the desensitization response. The ST was associated with a higher likelihood of remaining listed and a longer waitlist time without substantially impacting the HT rate, waitlist mortality, or early post-HT outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Most ST patients had a favorable response to desensitization, with a dose-dependent response observed for IVIG. The anti-HLA class likely impacts the ST response, whereas traditional sensitization risk factors had no impact on the response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1206-1213
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • desensitization
  • heart transplant
  • human leukocyte antigen sensitization
  • intravenous immunoglobulin
  • pediatric transplant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact and predictors of positive response to desensitization in pediatric heart transplant candidates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this