Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery

  • Lawrence R. Lustig
  • , Amy Ingram
  • , D. Macy Vidrine
  • , Andrew R. Gould
  • , Jacob W. Zeiders
  • , Randall A. Ow
  • , Christopher R. Thompson
  • , Jonathan R. Moss
  • , Ritvik Mehta
  • , John E. McClay
  • , Amy Brenski
  • , John Gavin
  • , Erik H. Waldman
  • , John Ansley
  • , David M. Yen
  • , Neil K. Chadha
  • , Michael T. Murray
  • , Frederick K. Kozak
  • , Christopher York
  • , David M. Brown
  • Eli Grunstein, Robert C. Sprecher, Denise A. Sherman, Scott R. Schoem, Robert Puchalski, Susannah Hills, Audrey Calzada, Dan Harfe, Laura J. England, Charles A. Syms
  • Columbia University
  • Advanced ENT and Allergy
  • South Carolina ENT Allergy and Sleep Medicine
  • South Florida Pediatric Otolaryngology
  • Sacramento Ear
  • Ear
  • Nose and Throat Associates
  • California Head and Neck Specialists
  • Frisco ENT for Children
  • Albany ENT and Allergy Services
  • Yale New Haven Health System
  • Carolina Ear Nose & Throat Clinic
  • Specialty Physician Associates
  • University of British Columbia
  • Camino Ear
  • ENT Clinics of San Antonio
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
  • Tusker Medical, Inc.
  • Ear Medical Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Evaluate technical success, tolerability, and safety of lidocaine iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement for children in an office setting. Study Design: Prospective individual cohort study. Methods: This prospective multicenter study evaluated in-office tube placement in children ages 6 months through 12 years of age. Anesthesia was achieved via lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis. Tube placement was conducted using an integrated and automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Anxiolytics, sedation, and papoose board were not used. Technical success and safety were evaluated. Patients 5 to 12 years old self-reported tube placement pain using the Faces Pain Scale–Revised (FPS-R) instrument, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very much pain). Results: Children were enrolled into three cohorts with 68, 47, and 222 children in the Operating Room (OR) Lead-In, Office Lead-In, and Pivotal cohorts, respectively. In the Pivotal cohort, there were 120 and 102 children in the <5 and 5- to 12-year-old age groups, respectively, with a mean age of 2.3 and 7.6 years, respectively. Bilateral tube placement was indicated for 94.2% of children <5 and 88.2% of children 5 to 12 years old. Tubes were successfully placed in all indicated ears in 85.8% (103/120) of children <5 and 89.2% (91/102) of children 5 to 12 years old. Mean FPS-R score was 3.30 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.39) for tube placement and 1.69 (SD = 2.43) at 5 minutes postprocedure. There were no serious adverse events. Nonserious adverse events occurred at rates similar to standard tympanostomy procedures. Conclusions: In-office tube placement in selected patients can be successfully achieved without requiring sedatives, anxiolytics, or papoose restraints via lidocaine iontophoresis local anesthesia and an automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:S1–S9, 2020.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S1-S9
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume130
Issue numberS4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Iontophoresis
  • local anesthesia
  • myringotomy
  • office surgery
  • pediatric
  • tympanostomy tube

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this