Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: A randomized clinical trial

  • James M. Chamberlain
  • , Pamela Okada
  • , Maija Holsti
  • , Prashant Mahajan
  • , Kathleen M. Brown
  • , Cheryl Vance
  • , Victor Gonzalez
  • , Richard Lichenstein
  • , Rachel Stanley
  • , David C. Brousseau
  • , Joseph Grubenhoff
  • , Roger Zemek
  • , David W. Johnson
  • , Traci E. Clemons
  • , Jill Baren
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Utah
  • Children's Hospital of Michigan
  • University of California at Davis
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Children's Hospital Denver
  • University of Ottawa
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
  • The EMMES Corporation
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

165 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Benzodiazepines are considered first-line therapy for pediatric status epilepticus. Some studies suggest that lorazepam may be more effective or safer than diazepam, but lorazepam is not Food and Drug Administration approved for this indication. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that lorazepam has better efficacy and safety than diazepam for treating pediatric status epilepticus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 1, 2008, to March 14, 2012. Patients aged 3 months to younger than 18 years with convulsive status epilepticus presenting to 1 of 11 US academic pediatric emergency departments were eligible. There were 273 patients; 140 randomized to diazepam and 133 to lorazepam. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either 0.2mg/kg of diazepam or 0.1mg/kg of lorazepam intravenously, with half this dose repeated at 5 minutes if necessary. If status epilepticus continued at 12 minutes, fosphenytoin was administered. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was cessation of status epilepticus by 10 minutes without recurrence within 30 minutes. The primary safety outcome was the performance of assisted ventilation. Secondary outcomes included rates of seizure recurrence and sedation and times to cessation of status epilepticus and return to baseline mental status. Outcomes were measured 4 hours after study medication administration. RESULTS: Cessation of status epilepticus for 10 minutes without recurrence within 30 minutes occurred in 101 of 140 (72.1%) in the diazepam group and 97 of 133 (72.9%) in the lorazepam group, with an absolute efficacy difference of 0.8% (95% CI, -11.4% to 9.8%). Twenty-six patients in each group required assisted ventilation (16.0% given diazepam and 17.6% given lorazepam; absolute risk difference, 1.6%; 95%CI, -9.9%to 6.8%). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes except that lorazepam patients were more likely to be sedated (66.9% vs 50%, respectively; absolute risk difference, 16.9%; 95%CI, 6.1% to 27.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among pediatric patients with convulsive status epilepticus, treatment with lorazepam did not result in improved efficacy or safety compared with diazepam. These findings do not support the preferential use of lorazepam for this condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00621478

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1652-1660
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume311
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: A randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this