Abstract
A marginal maximum a posteriori (MMAP) procedure was implemented to estimate item parameters in the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). Estimates from the MMAP method were compared with those derived from marginal maximum likelihood (MML) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedures in a recovery simulation that varied sample size, questionnaire length, and number of item response categories. MMAP item parameter estimates were generally the most accurate and had the smallest standard errors on average. In contrast, the accuracy and variability of MML estimates suffered substantially when the number of item response categories was small and the true item locations were extreme. MMAP estimates were also more computationally efficient than corresponding MCMC estimates. Consequently, the MMAP procedure is recommended for estimation of GGUM item parameters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-279 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Applied Psychological Measurement |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- generalized graded unfolding model
- GGUM
- marginal maximum a posteriori estimation
- marginal maximum likelihood estimation
- Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Marginal maximum a posteriori item parameter estimation for the generalized graded unfolding model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver