Medical students' self-reported typical counseling practices are similar to those assessed with standardized patients

Context/Objectives: We surveyed fourth-year medical students in the Class of 2003 at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta Georgia, about various personal and clinical practices. We were especially interseted in the frequency that these seniors reported of talking with patients about nutrition, weight, exercise, alcohol, and cigarette smoking. Because the validity of our findings about these counseling practices was limited by our having only self-reported data from seniors' questionaires, we developed a standarized patient (SP) examination to test the relationship between what students reported on the questionnaires and how they actually performed with SPs. Design/Setting/Main Outcome Measures: As part of a lengthy questionnaire, 88 senior medical students answered these 5 separated questions: "With a typical general medicine patient, how often do you actually talk to patients about: (1) nutrition; (2) exercise/physical activity; (3) weight; (4) smoking cessation (among smokers); and (5) alcohol? (never/rarely, sometimes, usually/always)." As part of their internal medicine subinternship final exam, students clinically assessed 4 SP cases with predetermined risk factors (poor diet, exercise, alcohol, and/or cigarette-smoking habits). Results: For every risk factor, the proportion of SPs actually counseled was higher for those students who self-reported discussing that risk factor more frequently with their patients. Additionally, the odds of counseling an SP for any risk factor were significantly higher (odds ratio = 1.76-2.80, P <.05) when students reported more frequent counseling. Conclusion: Student self-reports regarding patient counseling may be useful when resources are limited, and the purpose is to grossly and anonymously distinguish between higher and lower performers.