Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-Operative Management of Pediatric, Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Survey of Pediatric Surgeons' Perceptions and Practice

  • Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative
  • Cleveland Clinic Children's
  • Penn State Health Children's Hospital
  • Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital/Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Children's Wisconsin
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • Monroe Carrell Jr. Children's Hospital
  • Children's Hospital of Richmond
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  • Goryeb Children's Hospital
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital
  • University of Iowa
  • Valley Children’s Hospital
  • Arkansas Children’s Hospital
  • Langone Medical Center
  • Jo Dimaggio Children's Hospital
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Erlanger Health System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence supporting selective use of non-operative management (NOM) for children with uncomplicated, acute appendicitis, no consensus exists regarding its clinical application. This study characterizes surgeons' contemporary perceptions and utilization of NOM.

STUDY DESIGN: A survey addressing NOM was distributed to attending pediatric surgeons through the American Pediatric Surgical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery, and the Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative between 12/2023-6/2024.

RESULTS: The survey achieved a response rate of 41.0% (433/1,056). 42.0% reported regularly discussing NOM, but only half of those who discussed NOM did so in a balanced fashion. Fewer regularly offered NOM to eligible patients (27.9%). Common reasons for not offering NOM included the belief that recovery is faster after appendectomy (52.0%) and concern for high recurrence rates (51.5%). Common reasons for offering NOM included the belief that patients appreciate having options (49.2%) and the potential to avoid surgery (48.5%). 71.2% of surgeons considered absence of an appendicolith essential for attempting NOM, while fewer used symptom duration (50.8%), age (36.0%), or WBC (33.3%) when determining NOM eligibility. Therefore, many respondents did not apply the inclusion criteria used in early clinical trials, and when applied, some deviated from them, especially with increased present-day willingness to use NOM in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS: NOM is infrequently discussed with or offered to eligible patients due to limited surgeon buy-in and different valuations of its risks and benefits. However, many surgeons who do offer NOM are comfortable applying it to a broader patient population than initially studied.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Original languageEnglish
Article number162535
Pages (from-to)162535
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume61
Issue number1
Early online date12 Aug 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Keywords

  • Appendicitis
  • Non-operative management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgeon practice
  • Survey
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Appendicitis/therapy
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
  • Appendectomy
  • Acute Disease
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Female
  • Surgeons/psychology
  • Child
  • Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-Operative Management of Pediatric, Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Survey of Pediatric Surgeons' Perceptions and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this