Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease

  • Mark S. Bleiweis
  • , Joseph Philip
  • , Yuriy Stukov
  • , Giles J. Peek
  • , Gregory M. Janelle
  • , Andrew D. Pitkin
  • , Kevin J. Sullivan
  • , James C. Fudge
  • , Himesh V. Vyas
  • , Jose F. Hernandez-Rivera
  • , Dan Neal
  • , Omar M. Sharaf
  • , Jeffrey P. Jacobs
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n = 44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n = 37). Methods: The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival. Results: Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median = 65 days, range = 4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median = 4, range = 2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median = 134, range = 4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median = 1.9 years, range = 27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median = 11, range = 3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median = 97, range = 4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI = 46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI = 78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, P =.0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI = 40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI = 74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, P =.002. Conclusions: Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)708-715
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • acquired heart disease
  • CHD
  • congenital heart disease
  • single ventricle-ventricular assist device
  • sVAD
  • VAD
  • ventricular assist device

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this