Abstract
The ability of listeners to distinguish between compound and phrasal stress in English was examined on the basis of a picture selection task. The responses to naturally and synthetically produced stimuli were compared. While greater overall accuracy was observed with the natural stimuli, the same pattern of greater accuracy with compound stress than with phrasal stress was observed with both types of stimuli.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1699-1702 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH |
| State | Published - 2009 |
| Event | 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2009 - Brighton, United Kingdom Duration: 6 Sep 2009 → 10 Sep 2009 |
Keywords
- Phonetics
- Phonology
- Prosody
- Speech synthesis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress: Natural vs. synthetic speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver