Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared with Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Michael I. D'Angelica
  • , Ryan J. Ellis
  • , Jason B. Liu
  • , Brian C. Brajcich
  • , Mithat Gönen
  • , Vanessa M. Thompson
  • , Mark E. Cohen
  • , Susan K. Seo
  • , Emily C. Zabor
  • , Michele L. Babicky
  • , David J. Bentrem
  • , Stephen W. Behrman
  • , Kimberly A. Bertens
  • , Scott A. Celinski
  • , Carlos H.F. Chan
  • , Mary Dillhoff
  • , Matthew E.B. Dixon
  • , Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
  • , Sepideh Gholami
  • , Michael G. House
  • Paul J. Karanicolas, Harish Lavu, Shishir K. Maithel, John C. McAuliffe, Mark J. Ott, Bradley N. Reames, Dominic E. Sanford, Umut Sarpel, Courtney L. Scaife, Pablo E. Serrano, Travis Smith, Rebecca A. Snyder, Mark S. Talamonti, Sharon M. Weber, Adam C. Yopp, Henry A. Pitt, Clifford Y. Ko
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • American College of Surgeons
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Providence Portland Medical Center
  • Northwestern University
  • Baptist Memorial Medical Education
  • University of Ottawa
  • Baylor Health Care System
  • University of Iowa
  • Ohio State University
  • Rush University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of California at Davis
  • Indiana University Health
  • University of Toronto
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Emory University
  • Montefiore Health System
  • Primary Children's Medical Center
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Utah
  • McMaster University
  • Gunderson Health System
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Department of Veterans Affairs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

120 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in reducing SSI is poorly understood. Objective: To define the effect of broad-spectrum perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis on postoperative SSI incidence compared with standard care antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 clinical trial at 26 hospitals across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled between November 2017 and August 2021, with follow-up through December 2021. Adults undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy for any indication were eligible. Individuals were excluded if they had allergies to study medications, active infections, chronic steroid use, significant kidney dysfunction, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by the presence of a preoperative biliary stent. Participants, investigators, and statisticians analyzing trial data were unblinded to treatment assignment. Intervention: The intervention group received piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 or 4 g intravenously) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while the control group received cefoxitin (2 g intravenously; standard care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was development of postoperative SSI within 30 days. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and sepsis. All data were collected as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Results: The trial was terminated at an interim analysis on the basis of a predefined stopping rule. Of 778 participants (378 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [median age, 66.8 y; 233 {61.6%} men] and 400 in the cefoxitin group [median age, 68.0 y; 223 {55.8%} men]), the percentage with SSI at 30 days was lower in the perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam vs cefoxitin group (19.8% vs 32.8%; absolute difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -19.1% to -6.9%]; P <.001). Participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, vs cefoxitin, had lower rates of postoperative sepsis (4.2% vs 7.5%; difference, -3.3% [95% CI, -6.6% to 0.0%]; P =.02) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.7% vs 19.0%; difference, -6.3% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.2%]; P =.03). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.3% (5/378) among participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and 2.5% (10/400) among those receiving cefoxitin (difference, -1.2% [95% CI, -3.1% to 0.7%]; P =.32). Conclusions and Relevance: In participants undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy, use of piperacillin-tazobactam as perioperative prophylaxis reduced postoperative SSI, pancreatic fistula, and multiple downstream sequelae of SSI. The findings support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam as standard care for open pancreatoduodenectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269994.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1579-1588
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA
Volume329
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 May 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared with Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this