Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Practice variations for fetal and neonatal congenital heart disease within the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium

  • the CHNC Cardiac Focus Group
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • Emory University
  • Ohio State University
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
  • St
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Children's Memorial Hospital
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Brenner Children's Hospital
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Children’s Hospital Colorado
  • Alabama Children's Hospital
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Children's Hospital of Michigan
  • Children's Hospital of Omaha
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Wauwatosa
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Connecticut Children’s Hospital
  • Cook Children's Health Care System
  • AdventHealth Orlando
  • University of Toronto
  • Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • Primary Children's Medical Center
  • Rady Children's Hospital
  • Riley Hospital for Children
  • Seattle Children's
  • St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Texas Children's Hospital Houston
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Many aspects of care for fetuses and neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) fall outside standard practice guidelines, leading to the potential for significant variation in clinical care for this vulnerable population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of site sponsors of the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium, a multicenter collaborative of 41 Level IV neonatal intensive care units to assess key areas of clinical practice variability for patients with fetal and neonatal CHD. Results: We received responses from 31 centers. Fetal consult services are shared by neonatology and pediatric cardiology at 70% of centers. Three centers (10%) routinely perform fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with pregnancies complicated by fetal CHD. Genetic testing for CHD patients is routine at 76% of centers. Preoperative brain MRI is standard practice at 5 centers (17%), while cerebral NIRS monitoring is regularly used at 14 centers (48%). Use of electroencephalogram (EEG) after major cardiac surgery is routine in 5 centers (17%). Neurodevelopmental follow-up programs are offered at 30 centers (97%). Conclusions: Many aspects of fetal and neonatal CHD care are highly variable with evolving shared multidisciplinary models. Impact: Many aspects of fetal and neonatal CHD care are highly variable.Genetic testing, placental examination, preoperative neuroimaging, and postoperative EEG monitoring carry a high yield of finding abnormalities in patients with CHD and these tests may contribute to more precise prognostication and improve care.Evidence-based standards for prenatal and postnatal CHD care may decrease inter-center variability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1728-1735
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Research
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Fetal Heart
  • Fetus
  • Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Placenta/pathology
  • Pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practice variations for fetal and neonatal congenital heart disease within the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this