Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The devil is in the details: Understanding how misinformation regarding epilepsy manifests in TikTok videos

  • Midwestern University
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to understand the amount of misinformation surrounding epilepsy on the social media platform, TikTok. Methods: Videos from TikTok were searched using keyword “epilepsy.” In all, 109 videos were categorized as personal experience videos, event videos, or educational videos. Misinformation surrounding each video was analyzed by two independent reviewers. The number of videos and views of each were tracked. Results: Event videos garnered the most attention (80% of total views). Of the event videos, 26/47 contained misinformation in the form of calling a nonepileptic event an epileptic seizure (55%). Videos of nonepileptic events labeled as epileptic seizures amassed 109 956 400 views. Significance: This novel study quantifies the amount of misinformation regarding epilepsy on the social media platform, TikTok. The results showcase that misinformation is very prevalent on the application. Most of the misinformation consists of the mislabeling of nonepileptic events as epileptic seizures. Physicians should be aware of cardinal features of nonepileptic events to better treat patients. The medical community must understand the type of misinformation people are exposed to in order to educate patients appropriately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-32
Number of pages5
JournalEpileptic Disorders
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

Keywords

  • epilepsy
  • misinformation
  • nonepileptic events
  • social media
  • TikTok
  • video

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The devil is in the details: Understanding how misinformation regarding epilepsy manifests in TikTok videos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this