Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Trial: Subgroup Analysis

  • for the Pediatric Heart Network Investigators
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • HealthCore
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Columbia University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Wauwatosa
  • University of Utah
  • Sejong General Hospital
  • Seoul National University
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Southern California
  • University of Nebraska Omaha
  • Children’s National Hospital
  • University of Washington
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Stollery Children's Hospital
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Duke Children’s Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Pediatric Heart Network’s Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) Trial (Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., NCT 02741115) demonstrated improvements in some measures of exercise capacity and in the myocardial performance index following 6 months of treatment with udenafil (87.5 mg twice daily). In this post hoc analysis, we evaluate whether subgroups within the population experienced a differential effect on exercise performance in response to treatment. The effect of udenafil on exercise was evaluated within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including peak oxygen consumption (VO2), serum brain-type natriuretic peptide level, weight, race, gender, and ventricular morphology. Differences among subgroups were evaluated using ANCOVA modeling with fixed factors for treatment arm and subgroup and the interaction between treatment arm and subgroup. Within-subgroup analyses demonstrated trends toward quantitative improvements in peak VO2, work rate at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), VO2 at VAT, and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) for those randomized to udenafil compared to placebo in nearly all subgroups. There was no identified differential response to udenafil based on baseline peak VO2, baseline BNP level, weight, race and ethnicity, gender, or ventricular morphology, although participants in the lowest tertile of baseline peak VO2 trended toward larger improvements. The absence of a differential response across subgroups in response to treatment with udenafil suggests that the treatment benefit may not be restricted to specific sub-populations. Further work is warranted to confirm the potential benefit of udenafil and to evaluate the long-term tolerability and safety of treatment and to determine the impact of udenafil on the development of other morbidities related to the Fontan circulation. Trial Registration NCT0274115.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1691-1701
Number of pages11
JournalPediatric Cardiology
Volume44
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Child
  • Exercise
  • Exercise Test
  • Exercise Tolerance
  • Humans
  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
  • Sulfonamides/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Trial: Subgroup Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this