Abstract
Study Design.: Retrospective review. Objective.: To report on the safety of repetitive transcranial electric stimulation (RTES) for eliciting motor-evoked potentials during spine surgery. Summary of Background Data.: Theoretical concerns over the safety of RTES have hindered broader acceptance of transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tceMEP), despite successful implementation of spinal cord monitoring with tceMEPs in many large spine centers, as well as their apparent superiority over mixed-nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) for detection of spinal cord injury. Methods.: The records of 18,862 consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent spine surgery with tceMEP monitoring were reviewed for RTES-related complications. Results.: This large retrospective review identified only 26 (0.14%) cases with RTES-related complications; all but one of these were tongue lacerations, most of which were self-limiting. Conclusions.: The results demonstrate that RTES is a highly safe modality for monitoring spinal cord motor tract function intraoperatively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1046-1049 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Spine |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2011 |
Keywords
- repetitive transcranial electric stimulation
- safety
- spinal cord monitoring
- tceMEP
- transcranial electric motor evoked potentials
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: Is it safe?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver