Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Two Surgeon Approach for Complex Spine Surgery: Rationale, Outcome, Expectations, and the Case for Payment Reform

  • Jennifer M. Bauer
  • , Vijay Yanamadala
  • , Suken A. Shah
  • , Rajiv K. Sethi
  • University of Washington
  • Yeshiva University
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is an increased trend in complex spine deformity cases toward a two attending surgeon approach, but the practice has not become widely accepted by payers. Multiple studies have shown that spine surgery complications increase with the duration of case, estimated blood loss, and use of transfusions, as well as in certain high-risk populations or those requiring three-column osteotomies. Dual-surgeon cases have been shown to decrease estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical times, and therefore complication rates. Although this practice comes at an uncertain price to medical training and short-term costs, the patient's quality of care should be prioritized by institutions and payers to include dual-surgeon coverage for these high-risk cases. Because we enter an era where the value of spine care and demonstrating cost-effectiveness is essential, dual surgeon attending approaches can enhance these tenets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E408-E413
JournalThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume27
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two Surgeon Approach for Complex Spine Surgery: Rationale, Outcome, Expectations, and the Case for Payment Reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this