Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Two-Year Outcomes After Pediatric In-Office Tympanostomy Using Lidocaine/Epinephrine Iontophoresis and an Automated Tube Delivery System

  • Erik H. Waldman
  • , Amy Ingram
  • , D. Macy Vidrine
  • , Andrew R. Gould
  • , Jacob W. Zeiders
  • , Randall A. Ow
  • , Christopher R. Thompson
  • , Jonathan R. Moss
  • , Ritvik Mehta
  • , John E. McClay
  • , Amy Brenski
  • , John Gavin
  • , John Ansley
  • , David M. Yen
  • , Neil K. Chadha
  • , Michael T. Murray
  • , Frederick K. Kozak
  • , Christopher York
  • , David M. Brown
  • , Eli Grunstein
  • Robert C. Sprecher, Denise A. Sherman, Scott R. Schoem, Robert Puchalski, Susannah Hills, Dan Harfe, Laura J. England, Charles A. Syms, Lawrence R. Lustig
  • Yale New Haven Health System
  • Advanced ENT and Allergy
  • South Carolina ENT Allergy & Sleep Medicine (SCENT)
  • South Florida Pediatric Otolaryngology
  • Nose and Throat
  • Ear Nose and Throat Specialists of Abilene
  • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose & Throat Associates
  • California Head and Neck Specialists
  • Cook Children's Physician Network
  • Albany ENT and Allergy Services
  • Carolina Ear Nose & Throat Clinic
  • Specialty Physician Associates
  • University of British Columbia
  • Camino Ear
  • ENT Clinics of San Antonio
  • Columbia University
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Ear Medical Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate 2-year outcomes after lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis and tympanostomy using an automated tube delivery system for pediatric tube placement in-office. Study Design: Prospective, single-arm. Setting: Eighteen otolaryngology practices. Methods: Children age 6 months to 12 years indicated for tympanostomy were enrolled between October 2017 and February 2019. Local anesthesia of the tympanic membrane was achieved via lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis and tympanostomy was completed using an automated tube delivery system (the Tula® System). An additional Lead-In cohort of patients underwent tube placement in the operating room (OR) under general anesthesia using only the tube delivery system. Patients were followed for 2 years or until tube extrusion, whichever occurred first. Otoscopy and tympanometry were performed at 3 weeks, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Tube retention, patency, and safety were evaluated. Results: Tubes were placed in-office for 269 patients (449 ears) and in the OR for 68 patients (131 ears) (mean age, 4.5 years). The median and mean times to tube extrusion for the combined OR and In-Office cohorts were 15.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.41-19.05) and 16.79 (95% CI: 16.16-17.42) months, respectively. Sequelae included ongoing perforation for 1.9% of ears (11/580) and medial tube displacement for 0.2% (1/580) observed at 18 months. Over a mean follow-up of 14.3 months, 30.3% (176/580) of ears had otorrhea and 14.3% (83/580) had occluded tubes. Conclusion: In-office pediatric tympanostomy using lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis and automated tube delivery results in tube retention within the ranges described for similar grommet-type tubes and complication rates consistent with traditional tube placement in the OR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-709
Number of pages9
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume169
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Humans
  • Iontophoresis
  • Lidocaine
  • Middle Ear Ventilation/methods
  • Otitis Media with Effusion/surgery
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tympanic Membrane

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two-Year Outcomes After Pediatric In-Office Tympanostomy Using Lidocaine/Epinephrine Iontophoresis and an Automated Tube Delivery System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this