Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Variation among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Treating Medial Epicondyle Fractures

  • Meghan Hughes
  • , Karan Dua
  • , Nathan N. O'Hara
  • , Brian K. Brighton
  • , Theodore J. Ganley
  • , William L. Hennrikus
  • , Martin J. Herman
  • , Joshua E. Hyman
  • , J. Todd Lawrence
  • , Charles T. Mehlman
  • , Kenneth J. Noonan
  • , Norman Y. Otsuka
  • , Richard M. Schwend
  • , M. Wade Shrader
  • , Brian G. Smith
  • , Paul D. Sponseller
  • , Joshua M. Abzug
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
  • Carolinas HealthCare System
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
  • Columbia University
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Montefiore Health System
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
  • Children's of Mississippi
  • Yale University
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background:Medial epicondyle fractures are a common pediatric and adolescent injury accounting for 11% to 20% of elbow fractures in this population. This purpose of this study was to determine the variability among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating pediatric medial epicondyle fractures.Methods:A discrete choice experiment was conducted to determine which patient and injury attributes influence the management of medial epicondyle fractures by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. A convenience sample of 13 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 60 case vignettes of medial epicondyle fractures that included elbow radiographs and patient/injury characteristics. Displacement was incorporated into the study model as a fixed effect. Surgeons were queried if they would treat the injury with immobilization alone or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed effect regression model. In addition, surgeons filled out a demographic questionnaire and a risk assessment to determine if these factors affected clinical decision-making.Results:Elbow dislocation and fracture displacement were the only attributes that significantly influenced surgeons to perform surgery (P<0.05). The presence of an elbow dislocation had the largest impact on surgeons when choosing operative care (β=-0.14; P=0.02). In addition, for every 1 mm increase in displacement, surgeons tended to favor ORIF by a factor of 0.09 (P<0.01). Sex, mechanism of injury, and sport participation did not influence decision-making. In total, 54% of the surgeons demonstrated a preference for ORIF for the included scenarios. On the basis of the personality Likert scale, participants were neither high-risk takers nor extremely risk adverse with an average-risk score of 2.24. Participant demographics did not influence decision-making.Conclusions:There is substantial variation among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating medial epicondyle fractures. The decision to operate is significantly based on the degree of fracture displacement and if there is a concomitant elbow dislocation. There is no standardization regarding how to treat medial epicondyle fractures and better treatment algorithms are needed to provide better patient outcomes.Level of Evidence:Level V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e592-e596
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • discrete choice experiment
  • fracture
  • medial epicondyle
  • pediatric
  • treatment
  • variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Treating Medial Epicondyle Fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this