Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Best practices in intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: Development of an intraoperative checklist to optimize response

  • Michael G. Vitale
  • , David L. Skaggs
  • , Gregory I. Pace
  • , Margaret L. Wright
  • , Hiroko Matsumoto
  • , Richard C.E. Anderson
  • , Douglas L. Brockmeyer
  • , John P. Dormans
  • , John B. Emans
  • , Mark A. Erickson
  • , John M. Flynn
  • , Michael P. Glotzbecker
  • , Kamal N. Ibrahim
  • , Stephen J. Lewis
  • , Scott J. Luhmann
  • , Anil Mendiratta
  • , B. Stephens Richards
  • , James O. Sanders
  • , Suken A. Shah
  • , John T. Smith
  • Kit M. Song, Paul D. Sponseller, Daniel J. Sucato, David P. Roye, Lawrence G. Lenke
  • Columbia University
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • University of Utah
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Harvard University
  • University of Colorado Denver
  • Loyola University Chicago
  • Toronto Western Hospital University of Toronto
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
  • University of Rochester
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children
  • Johns Hopkins University

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

195 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Study Design Consensus-based creation of a checklist and guideline. Objective To develop a consensus-based checklist to guide surgeon responses to intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes in patients with a stable spine and to develop a consensus-based best practice guideline for IONM practice in the United States. Summary of Background Data Studies show that checklists enhance surgical team responses to crisis situations and improve patient outcomes. Currently, no widely accepted guidelines exist for the response to IONM changes in spine deformity surgery. Methods After a literature review of risk factors and recommendations for responding to IONM changes, 4 surveys were administered to 21 experienced spine surgeons and 1 neurologist experienced in IONM. Areas of equipoise were identified and the nominal group process was used to determine items to be included in the checklist. The authors reevaluated and modified the checklist at 3 face-to-face meetings over 12 months, including a period of clinical validation using a modified Delphi process. The group was also surveyed on current IONM practices at their institutions. This information and existing IONM position statements were used to create the IONM best practice guideline. Results Consensus was reached for the creation of 5 checklist headings containing 26 items to consider in the response to IONM changes. Consensus was reached on 5 statements for inclusion in the best practice guideline; the final guideline promotes a team approach and makes recommendations aimed at decreasing variability in neuromonitoring practices. Conclusions The final products represent the consensus of a group of expert spine surgeons. The checklist includes the most important and high-yield items to consider when responding to IONM changes in patients with a stable spine, whereas the IONM guideline represents the group consensus on items that should be considered best practice among IONM teams with the appropriate resources.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)333-339
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónSpine Deformity
Volumen2
N.º5
DOI
EstadoPublished - sept 2014
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Best practices in intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: Development of an intraoperative checklist to optimize response'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto