Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on the Management of Patients with Myelomeningocele: Whether Prenatal or Postnatal Closure Affects Future Ambulatory Status

  • David F. Bauer
  • , Alexandra D. Beier
  • , Dimitrios C. Nikas
  • , Nadege Assassi
  • , Jeffrey Blount
  • , Susan R. Durham
  • , Ann Marie Flannery
  • , Paul Klimo
  • , Catherine McClung-Smith
  • , Patricia Rehring
  • , Mandeep S. Tamber
  • , Rachana Tyagi
  • , Catherine A. Mazzola
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • University of Florida
  • Advocate Health Care
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Vermont
  • Women's and Children's Hospital
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center
  • University of South Carolina
  • Congress of Neurological Surgeons
  • University of British Columbia
  • Mercer University
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Newark

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

11 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

BACKGROUND: Myelomeningocele (MM) is an open neural tube defect treated by pediatric neurosurgeons with prenatal or postnatal closure. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to answer the question: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of prenatal vs postnatal closure of MM regarding short and long-Term ambulatory status? Treatment recommendations were provided based on the available evidence. METHODS: The National Library of Medicine PubMed database and Embase were queried using MeSH headings and keywords relevant to ambulatory status after prenatal or postnatal closure of MM. Abstracts were reviewed to identify which studies met the inclusion criteria. An evidence table was assembled summarizing the studies and the quality of evidence (Classes I-III). Based on the quality of the literature, a recommendation was rendered (Level I, II, or III). RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial (Class II) and 3 retrospective cohort studies (Class III) were included as evidence. Initial ambulatory status depended on anatomic level of the neural tube defect. In the short term, prenatal closure may improve ambulatory status compared to postnatal closure. Spinal cord tethering or dermoid inclusion cyst has been associated with neurologic deterioration in infants closed in utero and after birth. Ambulation may cease in both groups over time. No long-Term studies evaluated whether there is a difference in the ability to ambulate upon reaching adulthood. CONCLUSION: Prenatal closure of MM may improve ambulatory status in the short term (Level II). Spinal cord tethering in both groups caused deterioration in the ability to walk. Evaluation and treatment of spinal cord tethering may help maintain ambulatory status (Level III). No studies evaluate whether prenatal or postnatal repair provides improved ability to ambulate upon reaching adulthood. The full guideline can be found at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-spina-bifida-chapter-3.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículonyz263
Páginas (desde-hasta)E409-E411
PublicaciónClinical Neurosurgery
Volumen85
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 sept 2019
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on the Management of Patients with Myelomeningocele: Whether Prenatal or Postnatal Closure Affects Future Ambulatory Status'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto