Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Defining the role of advanced care practitioners in pediatric surgery practice

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Delivery of Surgical Care Committee
  • Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine
  • The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research
  • Greenville Health System
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School – Baystate
  • Pediatric Surgical Associates
  • Pediatric Surgical Associates, Ltd.
  • University of Montreal
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Primary Children's Medical Center
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Washington

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

10 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Introduction: The role of advanced care practitioners (ACPs) in pediatric surgery is increasingly important and not well described. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to pediatric surgery division chiefs within the Children's Hospital Association. Results: We received 77/163 survey responses (47%). The median number of ACPs per service was 3.0 (range 0–35). ACP number correlated with inpatient census, surgeon number, case volume, trauma centers, intensive care unit status, and fellowship programs but not with presence of residents/hospitalists, hospital setting, or practice type. Nearly all programs incorporated nurse practitioners while almost half utilized physician assistants. Approximately one-third of ACPs were designated for subspecialties (35%) such as trauma and colorectal. Only 9% of centers had surgeon-specific ACPs. ACP responsibilities included both inpatient and outpatient tasks. Nearly all ACPs participated in procedures (89%), mostly bedside (80%). All ACPs worked daytime shifts, with less nights and weekends. Most ACPs billed for services (80%). Satisfaction with ACP coverage was widespread and did not correlate with ACP number. Most respondents felt that ACPs enhance, and not hinder, resident/fellow training (85%). Conclusion: ACPs are useful adjuncts in pediatric surgery. A better understanding of practice patterns may help optimize utilization to enhance patient care and can be used to advocate for appropriate resources.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)2263-2269
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volumen56
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 2021
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Defining the role of advanced care practitioners in pediatric surgery practice'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto