TY - JOUR
T1 - Essential Knowledge and Skills for the Practice of Pediatric Surgical Oncology
T2 - A Modified Delphi Consensus Study by the APSA Cancer Committee
AU - the KidsCancerSurgery Research Group
AU - Tracy, Elisabeth T.
AU - Engwall, Abigail
AU - Brown, Erin G.
AU - Sun, Raphael C.
AU - Walther, Ashley
AU - Beckhorn, Catherine B.
AU - Lal, Dave
AU - Rothstein, David H.
AU - Roach, Jonathan
AU - Cost, Nicholas
AU - Rich, Barrie S.
AU - Ehrlich, Peter F.
AU - Aldrink, Jennifer H.
AU - Rodeberg, David
AU - Allen-Rhoades, Wendy
AU - Venkatramani, Rajkumar
AU - Malogolowkin, Marcio
AU - Wagner, Lars
AU - Foster, Jennifer
AU - Geller, James
AU - Alvarez, Elysia
AU - Linardic, Corrine
AU - Weiss, Aaron
AU - Polites, Stephanie
AU - Joharifard, Shahrzad
AU - McDuffie, Lucas
AU - Diaz-Miron, Jose
AU - Gulack, Brian
AU - Craig, Brian
AU - Javid, Patrick
AU - Petrosyan, Mikael
AU - Berman, Loren
AU - Lovvorn, Harold
AU - Mak, Grace
AU - Diesen, Diana
AU - Notrica, David
AU - Lillehei, Craig
AU - Nwomeh, Benedict
AU - Olson, Rohini
AU - Adibe, Obinna
AU - Gonzalez, Katherine
AU - Reynolds, Ellen
AU - Vasudevan, Sanjeev
AU - Dasgupta, Roshni
AU - Shamberger, Robert
AU - Kotagal, Meera
AU - Gow, Kenneth
AU - Weil, Brent
AU - Davidoff, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Society of Surgical Oncology 2025.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Purpose: Childhood cancer care has become increasingly complex. However, the exclusive practice of pediatric surgical oncology is not feasible for most surgeons taking care of these children. Thus, the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Cancer Committee conducted a modified Delphi study to reach a national consensus on the essential knowledge, skills, and institutional setting for surgeons caring for children with cancer. Methods: After development of candidate statements, the APSA Cancer Committee conducted a modified Delphi process consisting of two classic rounds and a third consensus round. Statements were reviewed by an expert panel consisting of pediatric surgical oncologists, pediatric medical oncologists, pediatric surgery program directors, general pediatric, recent pediatric surgery graduates. Consensus was defined a priori as Cronbach’s alpha > 0.8 and greater than 80% panel agreement. Results: Initial candidate statements comprised eight domains including solid tumors, metastasis, and institution resources. After review by the expert panel consisting of 35 panelists from 24 institutions across 18 US states and Canada, 177 statements achieved consensus. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha 0.989, 0.987, and 0.987 after rounds 1–3). A major emphasis of the consensus statements was on the importance of multidisciplinary care, including multidisciplinary surgical teams for complex resections, and knowledge of current tumor-specific management principles. Conclusions: This study represents the first national consensus study of the knowledge and skills essential for pediatric surgical oncology. These results should inform ongoing conversations about how best to match children with cancer to the surgeons equipped to care for them without creating additional barriers for families.
AB - Purpose: Childhood cancer care has become increasingly complex. However, the exclusive practice of pediatric surgical oncology is not feasible for most surgeons taking care of these children. Thus, the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Cancer Committee conducted a modified Delphi study to reach a national consensus on the essential knowledge, skills, and institutional setting for surgeons caring for children with cancer. Methods: After development of candidate statements, the APSA Cancer Committee conducted a modified Delphi process consisting of two classic rounds and a third consensus round. Statements were reviewed by an expert panel consisting of pediatric surgical oncologists, pediatric medical oncologists, pediatric surgery program directors, general pediatric, recent pediatric surgery graduates. Consensus was defined a priori as Cronbach’s alpha > 0.8 and greater than 80% panel agreement. Results: Initial candidate statements comprised eight domains including solid tumors, metastasis, and institution resources. After review by the expert panel consisting of 35 panelists from 24 institutions across 18 US states and Canada, 177 statements achieved consensus. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha 0.989, 0.987, and 0.987 after rounds 1–3). A major emphasis of the consensus statements was on the importance of multidisciplinary care, including multidisciplinary surgical teams for complex resections, and knowledge of current tumor-specific management principles. Conclusions: This study represents the first national consensus study of the knowledge and skills essential for pediatric surgical oncology. These results should inform ongoing conversations about how best to match children with cancer to the surgeons equipped to care for them without creating additional barriers for families.
KW - Pediatric cancer
KW - Pediatric surgical oncology
KW - Regionalization of care
KW - Specialization
KW - Surgical quality
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007105187
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-025-17335-4
DO - 10.1245/s10434-025-17335-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007105187
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 32
SP - 5752
EP - 5771
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 8
M1 - 150864
ER -