Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma

  • Gabrielle Pogge
  • , Erika A. Waters
  • , Gregory D. Webster
  • , David Fedele
  • , Sreekala Prabhakaran
  • , James A. Shepperd
  • University of Florida
  • Washington University St. Louis

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Commonsense epidemiology—how lay people think about diseases and their causes and consequences—can influence how people respond. We examined three lay epidemiological beliefs about 20 triggers and 19 symptoms among 349 caregivers of children with asthma. Our findings contradicted the prevalence-seriousness hypothesis (perceived prevalence and seriousness correlate negatively). The data partially supported the prevalence-control hypothesis (perceived prevalence and asthma control correlate negatively). We found weak support for the seriousness-control hypothesis (perceived seriousness and asthma control correlate negatively). These findings suggest boundary conditions on the application of commonsense epidemiological beliefs.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)2763-2769
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónJournal of Health Psychology
Volumen27
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct 2022
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto