TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of COVID-19 on Prenatal Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Congenital Heart Disease
T2 - Fetal Heart Society and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaborative Study
AU - Arya, Bhawna
AU - Hammoud, Miza Salim
AU - Toth, Andrew J.
AU - Woo, Joyce
AU - Campbell, Matthew
AU - Patel, Angira
AU - Edwards, Lindsay A.
AU - Freud, Lindsay
AU - Gandhi, Rupali
AU - Krishnan, Anita
AU - Peyvandi, Shabnam
AU - Pinto, Nelangi
AU - Ronai, Christina
AU - Tejtel, Kristen Sexson
AU - Moon-Grady, Anita
AU - Donofrio, Mary T.
AU - Srivastava, Shubhika
AU - Karamlou, Tara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2025/5/6
Y1 - 2025/5/6
N2 - BACKGROUND: Fetal echocardiography is the mainstay of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The COVID-19 pandemic led to shifts in triage of prenatal services. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on prenatal diagnosis, surgical outcomes, and disparities in neonatal critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) management in the United States during the pandemic's first year.METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared neonatal CCHD outcomes (requiring surgery within 60 days of birth) 1 year prior (prepandemic era) and during the peak pandemic era, supplemented by a Fetal Heart Society survey assessing regional practice changes. Data on prenatal diagnosis, demographics, outcomes, and 2020 state Area Deprivation Index were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum and χ
2 tests. The survey, completed by 72 fetal cardiologists from 9 US census regions, showed 75% of institutions implemented restrictions by March 2020, affecting triage, referrals, and number of prenatal cardiology visits. Compared with CCHD neonates born prepandemic (n=4637), those born during the pandemic (n=1806) had a higher proportion of prenatal diagnosis (66% versus 63%,
P<0.05). There were no significant differences in complications or mortality, but pandemic-era neonates had longer hospital stays. During the pandemic, CCHD neonates had a more disadvantaged Area Deprivation Index and had surgery at hospitals located in more advantaged regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Although pandemic-driven care delivery adjustments affected perinatal cardiology referrals and triage, prenatal diagnosis, perioperative outcomes, and survival remained robust. The management of CCHD demonstrates health care resilience, maintaining core prenatal and perioperative care. Regional variations highlight the need for targeted strategies to address disparities during health care crises.
AB - BACKGROUND: Fetal echocardiography is the mainstay of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The COVID-19 pandemic led to shifts in triage of prenatal services. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on prenatal diagnosis, surgical outcomes, and disparities in neonatal critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) management in the United States during the pandemic's first year.METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared neonatal CCHD outcomes (requiring surgery within 60 days of birth) 1 year prior (prepandemic era) and during the peak pandemic era, supplemented by a Fetal Heart Society survey assessing regional practice changes. Data on prenatal diagnosis, demographics, outcomes, and 2020 state Area Deprivation Index were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum and χ
2 tests. The survey, completed by 72 fetal cardiologists from 9 US census regions, showed 75% of institutions implemented restrictions by March 2020, affecting triage, referrals, and number of prenatal cardiology visits. Compared with CCHD neonates born prepandemic (n=4637), those born during the pandemic (n=1806) had a higher proportion of prenatal diagnosis (66% versus 63%,
P<0.05). There were no significant differences in complications or mortality, but pandemic-era neonates had longer hospital stays. During the pandemic, CCHD neonates had a more disadvantaged Area Deprivation Index and had surgery at hospitals located in more advantaged regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Although pandemic-driven care delivery adjustments affected perinatal cardiology referrals and triage, prenatal diagnosis, perioperative outcomes, and survival remained robust. The management of CCHD demonstrates health care resilience, maintaining core prenatal and perioperative care. Regional variations highlight the need for targeted strategies to address disparities during health care crises.
KW - COVID-19/epidemiology
KW - Cardiac Surgical Procedures
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Female
KW - Healthcare Disparities/trends
KW - Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery
KW - Humans
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Male
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Prenatal Diagnosis
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Societies, Medical
KW - Thoracic Surgery
KW - Triage
KW - Ultrasonography, Prenatal
KW - United States/epidemiology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004849035
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.124.037079
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.124.037079
M3 - Article
C2 - 40314351
AN - SCOPUS:105004849035
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 14
SP - e037079
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 9
M1 - e037079
ER -