Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Meeting Trainees Where They Are: Rethinking Fellowship Pipeline Development in Anesthesiology

  • Philip Carullo
  • , Sabina Khan
  • , Ariana Abdollahnejad
  • , Erin Conner
  • , Mitchell Phillips
  • , Kevin Spellman
  • , Allison Thoeny
  • , Tammy Wang
  • , Rebecca Nause-Osthoff
  • Emory University
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • University of Arizona
  • Stanford University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Background: Anesthesiology continues to attract growing interest among medical school graduates, yet its subspecialty fellowships remain chronically underfilled. Pediatric anesthesiology illustrates the pattern clearly, with unfilled fellowship positions rising more than fivefold between 2017 and 2023. Compensation is often cited as a driver but does not appear to fully explain the trend. Aims: This Perspective examines when subspecialty interest actually develops and argues that the traditional assumption that it forms during residency may already be too late. Findings: National Academies data indicate that a substantial share of pediatric subspecialists chose their field at the start of medical school, well before meaningful clinical exposure. A national survey of anesthesiology residents found that many enter their fellowship decision year without a subspecialty direction, and that adequate exposure during pediatric rotations was among the strongest predictors of fellowship pursuit, though such exposure varies widely by program. National efforts, including the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia's SPAERS committee and the Minds on Peds platform launching in early 2027, aim to standardize exposure earlier in training, in part through social media outreach to preclinical students. Fellowship fill rates have improved over this period of expanded outreach, although direct evidence linking social media exposure to subspecialty interest is still lacking. Conclusions: Residency-level interventions alone are unlikely to resolve the fellowship pipeline problem. The field should extend and standardize subspecialty exposure into the medical school years and build a deliberate, authentic presence on the platforms where trainees already learn.

Idioma originalEnglish
PublicaciónPaediatric Anaesthesia
DOI
EstadoAccepted/In press - 2026

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Meeting Trainees Where They Are: Rethinking Fellowship Pipeline Development in Anesthesiology'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto