Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress: Natural vs. synthetic speech

Irene Vogel; Arild Hestvik; H. Timothy Bunnell; Laura Spinu

Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress: Natural vs. synthetic speech

Irene Vogel
, Arild Hestvik
, H. Timothy Bunnell
, Laura Spinu

Center for Pediatric Auditory and Speech Sciences

University of Delaware

Producción científica › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

The ability of listeners to distinguish between compound and phrasal stress in English was examined on the basis of a picture selection task. The responses to naturally and synthetically produced stimuli were compared. While greater overall accuracy was observed with the natural stimuli, the same pattern of greater accuracy with compound stress than with phrasal stress was observed with both types of stimuli.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	1699-1702
Número de páginas	4
Publicación	Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH
Estado	Published - 2009
Evento	10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2009 - Brighton Duración: 6 sept 2009 → 10 sept 2009

Otros archivos y enlaces

https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70450158739

Citar esto

@article{8a688dd67c034ac6864a7a28e5a04564,

title = "Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress: Natural vs. synthetic speech",

abstract = "The ability of listeners to distinguish between compound and phrasal stress in English was examined on the basis of a picture selection task. The responses to naturally and synthetically produced stimuli were compared. While greater overall accuracy was observed with the natural stimuli, the same pattern of greater accuracy with compound stress than with phrasal stress was observed with both types of stimuli.",

keywords = "Phonetics, Phonology, Prosody, Speech synthesis",

author = "Irene Vogel and Arild Hestvik and Bunnell, \{H. Timothy\} and Laura Spinu",

year = "2009",

language = "English",

pages = "1699--1702",

journal = "Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH",

issn = "2308-457X",

publisher = "International Speech Communication Association",

note = "10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2009 ; Conference date: 06-09-2009 Through 10-09-2009",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress

T2 - 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2009

AU - Vogel, Irene

AU - Hestvik, Arild

AU - Bunnell, H. Timothy

AU - Spinu, Laura

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The ability of listeners to distinguish between compound and phrasal stress in English was examined on the basis of a picture selection task. The responses to naturally and synthetically produced stimuli were compared. While greater overall accuracy was observed with the natural stimuli, the same pattern of greater accuracy with compound stress than with phrasal stress was observed with both types of stimuli.

AB - The ability of listeners to distinguish between compound and phrasal stress in English was examined on the basis of a picture selection task. The responses to naturally and synthetically produced stimuli were compared. While greater overall accuracy was observed with the natural stimuli, the same pattern of greater accuracy with compound stress than with phrasal stress was observed with both types of stimuli.

KW - Phonetics

KW - Phonology

KW - Prosody

KW - Speech synthesis

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70450158739

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:70450158739

SN - 2308-457X

SP - 1699

EP - 1702

JO - Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH

JF - Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH

Y2 - 6 September 2009 through 10 September 2009

ER -

Perception of english compound vs. phrasal stress: Natural vs. synthetic speech

Resumen

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto