TY - JOUR
T1 - Qualitative assessment of facilitators and barriers to testicular torsion care
T2 - Findings from the testicular torsion collaborative
AU - Bing, Wentrell
AU - Rodriguez, Ian
AU - Dudley, Anne
AU - Durkin, Emily
AU - Fernandez, Nicolas
AU - Finkelstein, Julia
AU - Grimsby, Gwen
AU - McQuiston, Leslie
AU - Pohl, Hans
AU - Ramachandra, Puneeta
AU - Traxel, Erica
AU - Tong, Carmen
AU - Varda, Briony
AU - Whitehouse, Jill
AU - Ellison, Jonathan S.
N1 - Copyright © 2026 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/4
Y1 - 2026/4
N2 - Background Testicular torsion is a well-documented pediatric urological emergency that poses a time-sensitive risk to the testicle and long-term morbidity. Despite the urgent nature of testicular torsion, few studies have explored the institutional and clinical factors that influence diagnosis and management. To address this gap, we performed qualitative focus group interviews across the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIPP) Testicular Torsion Collaborative to better understand facilitators and barriers to testicular torsion care. Methods Relevant stakeholders involved in testicular torsion care (i.e. emergency department, radiology, urology, peri-operative services, anesthesia, and surgical quality leadership) across the Testicular Torsion Collaborative were invited to participate in focus group interviews led by a moderator and included a note-taker. All focus groups were recorded and transcribed via Zoom™ audio-visual conferencing software. Inductive coding was performed by 3 reviewers using Dedoose (Los Angeles CA). Themes were designated within the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) construct for implementation science and determined to be either a facilitator or barrier to testicular torsion care. Results Of the 29 invited sites, 10 sites and 47 individuals participated. Thematic saturation was reached for 20 themes, each represented in at least 2 focus group discussions. All elements of the TDF were represented in the discussions. Community education, culture of quality, high standard of care expectations, and leveraging available data were universally seen as facilitators. Long term follow-up and outcomes, manual detorsion care, and competing care demands were universally seen as barriers. Conclusions Based on focus groups of stakeholders in all aspects of testicular torsion care, opportunities to improve care include leveraging quality improvement culture and resources (i.e. trained personnel, data). Barriers to care include competing care demands arising from outside transfers and institutional clinical volume. We hope readers can use this data as a framework to improve in testicular torsion care.
AB - Background Testicular torsion is a well-documented pediatric urological emergency that poses a time-sensitive risk to the testicle and long-term morbidity. Despite the urgent nature of testicular torsion, few studies have explored the institutional and clinical factors that influence diagnosis and management. To address this gap, we performed qualitative focus group interviews across the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIPP) Testicular Torsion Collaborative to better understand facilitators and barriers to testicular torsion care. Methods Relevant stakeholders involved in testicular torsion care (i.e. emergency department, radiology, urology, peri-operative services, anesthesia, and surgical quality leadership) across the Testicular Torsion Collaborative were invited to participate in focus group interviews led by a moderator and included a note-taker. All focus groups were recorded and transcribed via Zoom™ audio-visual conferencing software. Inductive coding was performed by 3 reviewers using Dedoose (Los Angeles CA). Themes were designated within the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) construct for implementation science and determined to be either a facilitator or barrier to testicular torsion care. Results Of the 29 invited sites, 10 sites and 47 individuals participated. Thematic saturation was reached for 20 themes, each represented in at least 2 focus group discussions. All elements of the TDF were represented in the discussions. Community education, culture of quality, high standard of care expectations, and leveraging available data were universally seen as facilitators. Long term follow-up and outcomes, manual detorsion care, and competing care demands were universally seen as barriers. Conclusions Based on focus groups of stakeholders in all aspects of testicular torsion care, opportunities to improve care include leveraging quality improvement culture and resources (i.e. trained personnel, data). Barriers to care include competing care demands arising from outside transfers and institutional clinical volume. We hope readers can use this data as a framework to improve in testicular torsion care.
KW - Child
KW - Focus Groups
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Quality Improvement
KW - Spermatic Cord Torsion/diagnosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028165786
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.105711
DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.105711
M3 - Article
C2 - 41529991
AN - SCOPUS:105028165786
SN - 1477-5131
VL - 22
SP - 105711
JO - Journal of Pediatric Urology
JF - Journal of Pediatric Urology
IS - 2
M1 - 105711
ER -