Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Randomized phase II window trial of two schedules of irinotecan with vincristine in patients with first relapse or progression of rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

  • Leo Mascarenhas
  • , Elizabeth R. Lyden
  • , Philip P. Breitfeld
  • , David O. Walterhouse
  • , Sarah S. Donaldson
  • , Charles N. Paidas
  • , David M. Parham
  • , James R. Anderson
  • , William H. Meyer
  • , Douglas S. Hawkins
  • Unknown

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

91 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Purpose: To compare response rates for two schedules of irinotecan with vincristine in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma at first relapse or disease progression. Patients and Methods: Patients with first relapse or progression of rhabdomyosarcoma and an unfavorable prognosis were randomly assigned to one of two treatment schedules of irinotecan with vincristine: regimen 1A included irinotecan 20 mg/m2/d intravenously for 5 days at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 with vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5; regimen 1B included irinotecan 50 mg/m2/d intravenously for 5 days at weeks 1 and 4 with vincristine as in regimen 1A. Disease response was assessed at week 6. Those with responsive disease continued to receive 44 weeks of multiagent chemotherapy that incorporated the assigned irinotecan-vincristine regimen. Results: Ninety-two eligible patients were randomly assigned (1A, 45; 1B, 47). Response could be assessed in 89 patients (1A, 42; 1B, 47). There were five complete responses and six partial responses on regimen 1A (response rate, 26%; 95% CI, 16% to 42%) and 17 partial responses on regimen 1B (response rate, 37%; 95% CI, 25% to 51%; P = .36). Neutropenia was less common on regimen 1A (P = .04). One-year failure-free and overall survival rates for regimen 1A were 37% (95% CI, 23% to 51%) and 55% (95% CI, 39% to 69%), respectively, and for 1B, they were 38% (95% CI, 25% to 53%) and 60% (95% CI, 44% to 72%). Conclusion: There was no difference in the response rates between the two irinotecan-vincristine schedules. We recommend the shorter, more convenient regimen (1B) for further investigation.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)4658-4663
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volumen28
N.º30
DOI
EstadoPublished - 20 oct 2010
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Randomized phase II window trial of two schedules of irinotecan with vincristine in patients with first relapse or progression of rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto