Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Regional and practitioner variations in reporting infant mortality

  • Clarissa Polen-De
  • , Beena D. Kamath-Rayne
  • , Neera Goyal
  • , Emily DeFranco
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Cincinnati
  • American Academy of Pediatrics

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Objective: Assess regional differences in categorization of preterm delivery outcomes and impact on variation in reported infant mortality rates. Study design: A 27-item questionnaire was distributed to 1072 practitioners associated with U.S. birth hospitals. Five clinical scenarios were created to identify how participants classify delivery outcomes. Statistical analysis included Chi-square analysis and multinomial logistic regression. Results: 234 questionnaires were completed (response rate 22%). While >90% respondents classified a 14-week pregnancy loss with no sign of life as a miscarriage, only 22% would provide a fetal death certificate. Likewise, 37% would provide a certificate of live birth for a loss at 16 weeks with signs of life. There was notable regional variation in classifying these as live births (Northeast: 41%, Midwest: 44%, South: 13%, and West: 18%, p =.003). Conclusion: Regional practice variation in recording both live births and stillbirths was noted. Greater standardization in reporting practices may be warranted to improve the accuracy of reported birth outcomes in the U.S.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1278-1285
Número de páginas8
PublicaciónJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volumen35
N.º7
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2022

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Regional and practitioner variations in reporting infant mortality'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto