Reply letter to: RhinoChill: Do we need perfluorocarbons?

Producción científica › revisión exhaustiva

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	784-785
Número de páginas	2
Publicación	Resuscitation
Volumen	82
N.º	6
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.037
Estado	Published - jun 2011
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Acceder al documento

@article{5825ba02b5cd478aa6c07c630aa79983,

title = "Reply letter to: RhinoChill: Do we need perfluorocarbons?",

author = "Denise Barbut and Thomas Shaffer and Allan Rozenberg",

year = "2011",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.037",

language = "English",

volume = "82",

pages = "784--785",

journal = "Resuscitation",

issn = "0300-9572",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply letter to

T2 - RhinoChill: Do we need perfluorocarbons?

AU - Barbut, Denise

AU - Shaffer, Thomas

AU - Rozenberg, Allan

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79956156525

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.037

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.037

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:79956156525

SN - 0300-9572

VL - 82

SP - 784

EP - 785

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

IS - 6

ER -