Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Videolaryngoscopy versus Fiber-optic Intubation through a Supraglottic Airway in Children with a Difficult Airway: An Analysis from the Multicenter Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry

  • PeDI Collaborative
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Florida Atlantic University
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • University of Washington
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • The Children's Hospital, Aurora
  • University of Mississippi
  • Duke University
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Western Australia
  • University of New Mexico
  • Cornell University
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Instituto Nacional de Pediatria
  • Stanford University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

90 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: The success rates and related complications of various techniques for intubation in children with difficult airways remain unknown. The primary aim of this study is to compare the success rates of fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway to videolaryngoscopy in children with difficult airways. Our secondary aim is to compare the complication rates of these techniques. Methods: Observational data were collected from 14 sites after management of difficult pediatric airways. Patient age, intubation technique, success per attempt, use of continuous ventilation, and complications were recorded for each case. First-attempt success and complications were compared in subjects managed with fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway and videolaryngoscopy. Results: Fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway and videolaryngoscopy had similar first-attempt success rates (67 of 114, 59% vs. 404 of 786, 51%; odds ratio 1.35; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.00; P = 0.16). In subjects less than 1 yr old, fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway was more successful on the first attempt than videolaryngoscopy (19 of 35, 54% vs. 79 of 220, 36%; odds ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.31; P = 0.042). Complication rates were similar in the two groups (20 vs. 13%; P = 0.096). The incidence of hypoxemia was lower when continuous ventilation through the supraglottic airway was used throughout the fiber-optic intubation attempt. Conclusions: In this nonrandomized study, first-attempt success rates were similar for fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway and videolaryngoscopy. Fiber-optic intubation via supraglottic airway is associated with higher first-attempt success than videolaryngoscopy in infants with difficult airways. Continuous ventilation through the supraglottic airway during fiber-optic intubation attempts may lower the incidence of hypoxemia.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)432-440
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónAnesthesiology
Volumen127
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 sept 2017

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Videolaryngoscopy versus Fiber-optic Intubation through a Supraglottic Airway in Children with a Difficult Airway: An Analysis from the Multicenter Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto